Spoke too soon?
Last week I wrote about my predictions for a holiday refresh to the Apple product lineup and how they fared against reality.
The MacBook Pro part of the refresh will only minimally update the top-tier MBPs with more processing horsepower, maybe a 10-20% increase, and possibly quad-core options on the top-end $2000+ models. The focus is going to be on the low- and mid-end systems, so I wouldn’t be terribly shocked if there was no update at all to the MBPs.
0/2 here, but +1 to overall score for calling no update. I was close on the quad-cores – this update did include quad cores, but for the iMacs, not the MBPs. I should have figured, since no one uses quad-cores in their laptops today, but I was letting my hopes for the update cloud my judgment.
Well, it turns out I might have been less wrong than before! According to 9to5Mac.com, who were rather accurate in their predictions about the latest refresh, Apple may be about to unleash quad-core MacBook Pros after all!
… [W]e’ve heard that Apple Store Geniuses are being trained on new Quad-Core (possibly Core i5 and i7) processor MacBook Pros and they expect to take delivery of the new machines at the same time that the new high-end Core i5 and Core i7 iMacs hit stores in November. That would probably be timed right with a 10.6.2 release.
Apple has traditionally used the same processors in iMacs and high end MacBook/Powerbooks with the exception of the G5 iMac. iMacs and MacBook Pros were also the first Macs with Intel chips, introduced simultaneously in 2006.
But then there’s this:
We haven’t heard anything about outer design changes which would be unlikely – the current MacBook Pros were updated earlier this year with SD cards and enclosed batteries. We also expect these things to top out at 8GB of RAM. The iMacs can go to 16GB but that is with four RAM slots.
Repeat after me Apple: HDMI-out, antiglare standard, and Blu-Ray. Everyone else gets it, why not you?
I know, I know, it will never happen, Apple wants to promote HD downloads, etc. A guy can dream, can’t he?





